3
Judgment : High Court Division
(If you feel problem with font, please, download Bangla font from Downloads Link)
 
Case Category : 
Case Type
Case Number
Year
Parties
Short Description
 

Case Number Parties Short Description
51
52 Energy Prima Limited Versus People’s Republic of Bangladesh and others
53 Md. Abdus Sobhan Sarker Vs. Md. Shahidul Kabir
54 Dewan Taimur Mostafa Hossain Vs. Md. Shamsur Rahman
55 Mst. Kajoli Bibi Vs. Mst. Rahila Khatun and another
56 Abu Bakkar Majhi @ Md. Abu Bakkar Majhi Vs. Mst. Salina Begum and others
57 Most. Nurunnahar Begum Vs. The Government of Bangladesh represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Pabna and others
58 লাল মিয়া ও অন্যান্য বনাম বাংলাদেশ সরকার ও অন্যান্য
59 The State Vs. Ministry of law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs, Government of Bangladesh, represented by it’s Secretary, Bangladesh Secretarat, Ramna, Dhaka and others. • Mobile Courts vs. Children in Bangladesh.
• Mobile Courts have no jurisdiction to try, convict and sentence any child in conflict with law.
60 Children’s Charity Bangladesh Foundation (CCB Foundation). Vs. National Human Rights Commission and others. • Negligence/incompetence of National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) in a particular case discussed.
• NHRC may inquire into the allegations against law enforcing agencies to some extent.
• Different aspects of NHRC in Bangladesh discussed.
61 নাহিদ আফরোজ ও অন্যান্য বনাম বাংলাদেশ সরকার ও অন্যান্য
62 শেখ আব্দুল্লাহ আল মামুন বনাম বাংলাদেশ সরকার গং সংগে এ, এম, জামিউল হক গং বনাম বাংলাদেশ সরকার গং সংগে আইনুন্নাহার সিদ্দীকা গং বনাম বাংলাদেশ সরকার গং সংগে জাস্টিস ওয়াচ ফাউন্ডেশন বনাম বাংলাদেশ সরকার গং সংগে অ্যাড. মো: মাহবুবুল ইসলাম বনাম বাংলাদেশ সরকার গং
63 Abdul Kader and others Vs Government of Bangladesh and others
64 Syed Nuruddin Ahmed Vs Maxwell Stamp Ltd. and others
65 Engr. Md. Anwar Hossen Vs Chittagong Club Ltd and others
66 Bangladesh Power Development Board Vs Powerpac-Mutiara Keraniganj Power Plant Ltd.
67 Abdu alias Abdu Miah and others vs Yasnobi and others
68 Niaz Muhammad Mahboob va Bangladesh and others. /United Hospital,Dhaka.
69 Jodge Miah and others Vs. Bangladesh and others
70 Mohammad Samiul Huq and another Vs. Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Secreatry, Ministry of Home Affairs, Bangladesh Secretariat, Ramna, Dhaka-1000 and others. Nipun Khela 1-10, 1-8 Charchari, Dice, Housie, Three cards, Flash, Poker etc. are gambling. Dhaka Club Ltd. and other clubs can not allow gambling in their premises.
71 S.M. Kuddus Zaman and others Vs. Md. Nurul Islam and others Arpito Sampatti Pratyarpan, Rajbari
72 Amin Ahmed Vs. Umme Kulsum and others
73 Md. Abdul Mannan Vs. Alhaj M.A. Khair being dead his heirs: Nilufar Khair and others
74 Md. Monjurul Hoque Chowdhury and others Vs.Bilkis Ara Begum and another
75 Md. Lutfor Rahman and others Versus Govt. of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Housing and Public Works, Bangladesh Secretariat, Ramna, Dhaka and others. An application under Article 102 of the Constitution of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh.
76 S. M. Nahaz Pasha (Advocate) and others. -Vs-Government of the People’s Republic ofBangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministryof Health, Bangladesh Secretariat, Ramna, Dhakaand others.
77
78 Mrs. Cyma Salam. -Versus- Amina Begum and others
79 The State Vs. R.D.O of 105 Touhidul alam, C.S-01 and others 151 persons with other appellants and respondent BDR Case (Mr. Justice Md. Shawkat Hossain)
80 The State Vs. R.D.O of 105 Touhidul alam, C.S-01 and others 151 persons with other appellants and respondent BDR Case (Mr. Justice Md. Abu Zafor Siddique)
81 The State Vs. R.D.O of 105 Touhidul alam, C.S-01 and others 151 persons with other appellants and respondent BDR Case (Mr. Justice Md. Nazrul Islam Talukder)
82 Mohammad Manjurul Alam Vs. Govt. of Bangladesh An application under Article 102 of the Constitution of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh.
83 Md. Iftekhar Husain Chowdhury An application under Article 102 of the Constitution of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh.
84 Rawshan Ali and others Vs. Govt. of Bangladesh An application under Article 102 of the Constitution of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh
85 Mohammad Manjurul Alam An application under Article 102 of the Constitution of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh
86 Abul Kalam Azad and others An application under Article 102 of the Constitution of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh
87 Reaj Parvej and others An application under Article 102 of the Constitution of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh.
88 Karnafully Fertilizer Company Limited Vs. Govt. of Bangladesh
89 Md. Giasuddin VS Govt. of Bangladesh
90 Md. Shahjamal Sardar and others VS Govt. of Bangladesh
91 Human Rights and Peace for Bangladesh (HRPB) represented by its Secretary-in-charge and others. Vs. Bangladesh represented by the Cabinet Secretary, Cabinet Division and others.
92 Sree Bhuban Chandra Sutradhar and others VS Md. Afroj Afgan Choudhury and Others
93 Md. Mofazzal Hossain and others Vs. Bangladesh, represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Gazipur
94 Mir Mohammad Helal Uddin Vs. The State and another
95 নিগার সুলতানা বনাম বাংলাদেশ সরকার গং কোন ভুক্তভোগীর অভিযোগের বিষয়ে সংশ্লিষ্ট কর্তৃপক্ষ যদি দ্রুত পদক্ষেপ ও যথাযথ ব্যবস্থা গ্রহণ করে সেক্ষেত্রে একদিকে যেমন অনেক অনাকাঙ্খিত পরিস্থিতি এড়ানো সম্ভব হবে, অন্যদিকে ভুক্তভোগীদের মানসিক যাতনা, আর্থিক ক্ষতি এবং আদালতের দ্বারস্থ হওয়া থেকে রেহাই দেয়াও সম্ভব হবে।. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . সে কারণে, আদালত প্রত্যাশা করে যে, পুলিশসহ আইনশৃঙ্খলা বাহিনীর সদস্যদের বিরুদ্ধে কোন অভিযোগ উত্থাপিত হলে ঐ অভিযোগ সম্পর্কে দ্রুততার সাথে বিভাগীয় তদন্ত সম্পন্ন এবং দোষী প্রমাণিত হলে দ্রুত আইনানুগ (বিভাগীয়/ফৌজদারী) পদক্ষেপ গ্রহণ করা প্রয়োজন। আদালতের এ প্রত্যাশা বিবেচনায় নিয়ে মহা-পুলিশ পরিদর্শক এ বিষয়ে প্রয়োজনীয় কার্যকর ব্যবস্থা গ্রহণ এবং ‘আইজিপি কমপ্লেইন্টস্ মনিটরিং সেল’র কার্যক্রমকে আরো কার্যকর ও গতিশীল করবেন মর্মে আদালতের দৃঢ় বিশ্বাস।
96 Md. Anis Hossain Prodhan alias Anis Hasan Prodhan alias Dollar Vs. The State, represented by the Deputy Commissioner Lalmonirhat The main criteria for constituting an offence under section 57 of the Act is that the fake or obscene information/comments or materials shall have to be published or transmitted for public in general in the website or electronic form, not for any particular individual. Accordingly, we can safely conclude that mere sending obscene or fake information through SMS from one’s cellular phone to another individual’s cellular phone cannot be construed as a publication or transmission for public in general and hence, does not constitute an offence under section 57 of the ICT Act.
97 Md. Mahmudul Hasan Vs. The State Necessity of the Lawyer`s certificate
98 Md. Asaduzzaman -Vs- The State at the investigation stage the investigation officer has no authority to adjudicate on the propriety or credibility of a statement made by an accused under section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. It has to be taken into consideration by the investigating officer as it is. It is the duty of the trial judge to examine and asses the truth, veracity and voluntariness of a statement under section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure made by an accused. An investigating officer cannot steps into the shoes of a trial judge.
99 Md. Waliullah Apu Vs. Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh and others Taking notice of the above scenario, we are also constrained to direct the 1) Secretary, Cabinet Division, 2) the Secretary (সুরক্ষা ও সেবা), Ministry of Home Affairs and all the 3) District Magistrate to take necessary steps for providing the certified copies of the documents and order passed by the Executive Magistrate acted under Mobile Court Act,2009 to the concerned person/convict within a period of 05(five) days from the date of receiving the application for the same
100 সিফার্ড ইন্ডাষ্ট্রিজ লিমিটেড বনাম জিয়াসু সিটিজ ইসেন কোঃ লিঃ
This Site is Visited :